Sunday Book-Thought 70

Ghostwriting especially highlights power exchanges between writing and social structures, and also illuminates assumptions about underlying reading and writing processes that enable such exchanges. In the case of the ghostwritten campaign books, for instance, we see how a ‘name’ – that is, a person with currency, social importance, celebrity, or notoriety – can endow a piece of writing with power. Their status brings status to the writing; they are connected to it by name, and it is this connection that authorizes the writing and warrants the reading of it. From this perspective, the actual working out of the words – the writing – is treated with lesser importance: the writer is a mere instrument in completing the connection, a presence not considered meaningful to the reading. Not only ghostwritten books but also much of the writing we encounter in bureaucratic society participates in this power arrangement, whereby words are made significant not by having been written but by the status of the official issuer.
Deborah BrandtThe Rise of Writing: Redefining Mass Literacy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), p. 31.

Advertisements

Have something to say?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s